Cabo Verde vs Samoa: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Samoa
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 397.98 t against 268.78 t in Samoa, a difference of 129.2 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.5 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 176th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 4 and Samoa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81.62 t | 137.12 t | 55.5 t | Samoa |
| 1970s | 134.02 t | 167.2 t | 33.18 t | Samoa |
| 1980s | 298.65 t | 333.31 t | 34.66 t | Samoa |
| 1990s | 742.77 t | 392.52 t | 350.25 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 638.17 t | 436.41 t | 201.76 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 434.04 t | 389.18 t | 44.86 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 396.87 t | 267.75 t | 129.12 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Samoa?
- Cabo Verde, at 397.98 t against 268.78 t in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Samoa?
- 129.2 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Samoa rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 176th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).