Cabo Verde vs Turkmenistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 179,371 t against 397.98 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 178,973 t.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 450.7 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 800.32 t | 41,542 t | 40,741 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 638.17 t | 70,404 t | 69,766 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 434.04 t | 132,845 t | 132,411 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 396.87 t | 169,273 t | 168,876 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 179,371 t against 397.98 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan?
- 178,973 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).