Cambodia vs Paraguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cambodia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 58,394 t against 51,852 t in Paraguay, a difference of 6,542 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 67th and Paraguay ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,999 t | 4,445 t | 6,554 t | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 9,783 t | 6,042 t | 3,741 t | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 10,321 t | 9,558 t | 763.34 t | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 17,772 t | 16,881 t | 891.26 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 21,241 t | 23,839 t | 2,598 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 39,622 t | 45,602 t | 5,980 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 51,092 t | 52,626 t | 1,534 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cambodia or Paraguay?
- Cambodia, at 58,394 t against 51,852 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cambodia and Paraguay?
- 6,542 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Paraguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cambodia ranks 67th and Paraguay ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).