Cameroon vs Ethiopia PDR: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cameroon
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 26,557 t against 25,042 t in Cameroon, a difference of 1,515 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 101st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,490 t | 14,282 t | 10,792 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 7,156 t | 17,203 t | 10,047 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 12,756 t | 21,236 t | 8,479 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 9,824 t | 27,102 t | 17,278 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cameroon or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 26,557 t against 25,042 t in Cameroon as of 1992.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR?
- 1,515 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cameroon ranks 101st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).