Central African Republic vs Ethiopia: Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central African Republic
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 201,885 t against 6,647 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 195,238 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 30.4 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,645 t | 32,454 t | 28,809 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 4,965 t | 45,421 t | 40,455 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 6,417 t | 109,809 t | 103,392 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 6,624 t | 178,657 t | 172,033 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation β cropland nitrogen, Central African Republic or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 201,885 t against 6,647 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation β cropland nitrogen between Central African Republic and Ethiopia?
- 195,238 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Ethiopia rank globally for volatilisation β cropland nitrogen?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).