Chad vs Latvia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chad
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 26,669 t against 25,784 t in Chad, a difference of 885 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,044 t | 18,208 t | 12,164 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 9,279 t | 16,298 t | 7,019 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 16,259 t | 24,639 t | 8,380 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 23,766 t | 27,609 t | 3,843 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Chad or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 26,669 t against 25,784 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Chad and Latvia?
- 885 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Latvia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Chad ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).