Colombia vs Romania: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Romania
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 227,124 t against 190,938 t in Romania, a difference of 36,186 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Colombia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,439 t | 145,833 t | 100,394 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 71,627 t | 280,914 t | 209,287 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 105,494 t | 376,765 t | 271,270 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 151,851 t | 189,075 t | 37,225 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 189,596 t | 147,430 t | 42,166 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 222,080 t | 165,748 t | 56,332 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 230,927 t | 195,924 t | 35,002 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Romania?
- Colombia, at 227,124 t against 190,938 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Romania?
- 36,186 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Romania rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).