Costa Rica vs Finland: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Finland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 38,967 t against 38,740 t in Finland, a difference of 227 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 83rd and Finland ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,373 t | 40,516 t | 32,143 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 14,189 t | 57,076 t | 42,886 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 20,236 t | 59,099 t | 38,863 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 29,301 t | 49,875 t | 20,574 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 28,807 t | 43,270 t | 14,463 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 37,815 t | 39,808 t | 1,993 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 37,040 t | 37,205 t | 164.6 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Finland?
- Costa Rica, at 38,967 t against 38,740 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Finland?
- 227 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Finland rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 83rd and Finland ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).