Costa Rica vs Ireland: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Ireland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 38,967 t against 35,350 t in Ireland, a difference of 3,617 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 83rd and Ireland ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,373 t | 15,422 t | 7,050 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 14,189 t | 26,182 t | 11,992 t | Ireland |
| 1980s | 20,236 t | 37,264 t | 17,029 t | Ireland |
| 1990s | 29,301 t | 43,636 t | 14,335 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 28,807 t | 41,153 t | 12,346 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 37,815 t | 40,505 t | 2,689 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 37,040 t | 40,485 t | 3,444 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Ireland?
- Costa Rica, at 38,967 t against 35,350 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 3,617 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Ireland rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 83rd and Ireland ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).