Costa Rica vs Tajikistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 41,576 t against 38,967 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 2,609 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,793 t | 19,689 t | 11,104 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 28,807 t | 12,300 t | 16,507 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 37,815 t | 20,593 t | 17,223 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 37,040 t | 40,972 t | 3,932 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 41,576 t against 38,967 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 2,609 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Tajikistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 77th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).