Cuba vs Georgia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 14,787 t against 14,302 t in Georgia, a difference of 485 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 116th and Georgia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,438 t | 13,895 t | 35,543 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 28,283 t | 9,160 t | 19,123 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 31,429 t | 6,806 t | 24,623 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 19,134 t | 14,701 t | 4,434 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Georgia?
- Cuba, at 14,787 t against 14,302 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Georgia?
- 485 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 116th and Georgia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).