Czechia vs Hungary: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen

Czechia
91,098 t
in 2023
Hungary
101,876 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
47th
Hungary rank
44th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Czechia
  • Hungary
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 101,876 t against 91,098 t in Czechia, a difference of 10,778 t.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 47th and Hungary ranks 44th of 201 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 102,664 t 111,867 t 9,203 t Hungary
2000s 95,391 t 117,283 t 21,892 t Hungary
2010s 120,988 t 130,709 t 9,721 t Hungary
2020s 106,261 t 135,172 t 28,910 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Hungary?
Hungary, at 101,876 t against 91,098 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Hungary?
10,778 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hungary?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Hungary rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
Czechia ranks 47th and Hungary ranks 44th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).