Czechia vs Myanmar: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 101,379 t against 91,098 t in Czechia, a difference of 10,281 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 47th and Myanmar ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102,664 t | 91,871 t | 10,793 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 95,391 t | 97,806 t | 2,416 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 120,988 t | 162,513 t | 41,525 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 106,261 t | 143,185 t | 36,923 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 101,379 t against 91,098 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Myanmar?
- 10,281 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Myanmar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Myanmar rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 47th and Myanmar ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).