Czechoslovakia vs Romania: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 190,938 t against 152,853 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 38,085 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 141,099 t | 145,833 t | 4,734 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 227,614 t | 280,914 t | 53,300 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 272,606 t | 376,765 t | 104,159 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 190,204 t | 258,774 t | 68,570 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Romania?
- Romania, at 190,938 t against 152,853 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Romania?
- 38,085 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Romania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Romania rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).