Czechoslovakia vs Yugoslav SFR: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 165,685 t against 152,853 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 12,832 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 141,099 t | 134,173 t | 6,926 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 227,614 t | 193,452 t | 34,162 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 272,606 t | 233,052 t | 39,554 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 208,880 t | 188,263 t | 20,616 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 165,685 t against 152,853 t in Czechoslovakia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 12,832 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).