Dominica vs Grenada: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Grenada
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 115.52 t against 106.44 t in Grenada, a difference of 9.08 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 187th and Grenada ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 44.66 t | 39.29 t | 5.36 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 214.01 t | 51.55 t | 162.46 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 401.45 t | 40.41 t | 361.03 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 569.75 t | 49.15 t | 520.6 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 238.14 t | 77.25 t | 160.89 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 162.38 t | 100.53 t | 61.85 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 133.23 t | 111.6 t | 21.64 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Grenada?
- Dominica, at 115.52 t against 106.44 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Grenada?
- 9.08 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Grenada rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 187th and Grenada ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).