Dominican Republic vs Nepal: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 47,000 t against 45,094 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1,906 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 77th and Nepal ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,953 t | 11,105 t | 2,152 t | Nepal |
| 1970s | 16,181 t | 16,339 t | 158.04 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 14,973 t | 26,217 t | 11,244 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 23,112 t | 39,119 t | 16,008 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 28,987 t | 28,386 t | 600.6 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 38,890 t | 55,289 t | 16,399 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 50,918 t | 61,230 t | 10,311 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 47,000 t against 45,094 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Nepal?
- 1,906 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Nepal rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 77th and Nepal ranks 75th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).