Eastern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eastern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 715,556 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 327,761 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 1.8 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 38 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 190,155 t | 268,553 t | 78,398 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 241,795 t | 210,252 t | 31,543 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | 426,812 t | 282,933 t | 143,878 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 622,725 t | 366,980 t | 255,744 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation β cropland nitrogen, Eastern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Eastern Africa, at 715,556 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation β cropland nitrogen between Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 327,761 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation β cropland nitrogen?
- Eastern Africa ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).