El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 22,399 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador, a difference of 5,020 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
El Salvador ranks 102nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,188 t | 17,488 t | 3,700 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 21,886 t | 16,976 t | 4,910 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 22,107 t | 19,711 t | 2,396 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 17,409 t | 22,266 t | 4,858 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 22,399 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5,020 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 102nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).