El Salvador vs Madagascar: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 19,379 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2,000 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 112th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,237 t | 7,184 t | 5,053 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 24,616 t | 8,747 t | 15,869 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 21,279 t | 12,138 t | 9,142 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 21,153 t | 13,042 t | 8,111 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 21,886 t | 10,490 t | 11,396 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 22,107 t | 17,575 t | 4,532 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 17,409 t | 18,402 t | 993.4 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 19,379 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Madagascar?
- 2,000 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Madagascar rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 112th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).