El Salvador vs South Sudan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 17,980 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador, a difference of 601 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 102nd and South Sudan ranks 101st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20,334 t | 15,737 t | 4,597 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 17,409 t | 17,588 t | 179.07 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 17,980 t against 17,379 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and South Sudan?
- 601 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and South Sudan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 102nd and South Sudan ranks 101st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).