Eritrea vs Eswatini: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2,727 t against 2,243 t in Eritrea, a difference of 484 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eritrea ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,925 t | 1,186 t | 738.58 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,968 t | 1,844 t | 124.82 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2,280 t | 2,253 t | 26.76 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,571 t | 2,834 t | 263.03 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 2,727 t against 2,243 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 484 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Eswatini rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).