Estonia vs Jordan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Jordan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 13,581 t against 12,098 t in Jordan, a difference of 1,483 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 122nd and Jordan ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,738 t | 3,410 t | 9,327 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 10,082 t | 3,417 t | 6,666 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 12,954 t | 6,845 t | 6,108 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 14,687 t | 8,827 t | 5,860 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Jordan?
- Estonia, at 13,581 t against 12,098 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Jordan?
- 1,483 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Jordan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Jordan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 122nd and Jordan ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).