Ethiopia PDR vs Mali: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 28,345 t against 26,557 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 1,788 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 99th and Mali ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,282 t | 2,864 t | 11,417 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 17,203 t | 4,163 t | 13,040 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 21,236 t | 5,975 t | 15,260 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 27,102 t | 6,703 t | 20,399 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Mali?
- Mali, at 28,345 t against 26,557 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Mali?
- 1,788 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Mali rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 99th and Mali ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).