Ethiopia vs Turkmenistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 201,885 t against 179,371 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 22,514 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 31st and Turkmenistan ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,454 t | 41,928 t | 9,473 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 45,421 t | 70,404 t | 24,983 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 109,809 t | 132,845 t | 23,036 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 178,657 t | 169,273 t | 9,384 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Turkmenistan?
- Ethiopia, at 201,885 t against 179,371 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Turkmenistan?
- 22,514 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Turkmenistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Turkmenistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 31st and Turkmenistan ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).