Finland vs Ireland: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Finland
- Ireland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 38,740 t against 35,350 t in Ireland, a difference of 3,390 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 84th and Ireland ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Ireland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,516 t | 15,422 t | 25,093 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 57,076 t | 26,182 t | 30,894 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 59,099 t | 37,264 t | 21,834 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 49,875 t | 43,636 t | 6,239 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 43,270 t | 41,153 t | 2,117 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 39,808 t | 40,505 t | 696.24 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 37,205 t | 40,485 t | 3,280 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Ireland?
- Finland, at 38,740 t against 35,350 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Ireland?
- 3,390 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Ireland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Ireland rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Finland ranks 84th and Ireland ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).