Finland vs Slovakia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Finland
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 39,194 t against 38,740 t in Finland, a difference of 454 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 84th and Slovakia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,267 t | 38,339 t | 10,928 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 43,270 t | 36,052 t | 7,218 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 39,808 t | 43,269 t | 3,461 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 37,205 t | 43,056 t | 5,851 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 39,194 t against 38,740 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Slovakia?
- 454 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Slovakia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Finland ranks 84th and Slovakia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).