France vs Melanesia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- France
- Melanesia
How they compare
France currently reports 676,156 t against 15,551 t in Melanesia, a difference of 660,605 t.
That makes France's figure about 43.5 times Melanesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 11th and Melanesia ranks 14th of 186 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 500,616 t | 3,376 t | 497,240 t | France |
| 1970s | 745,579 t | 6,155 t | 739,424 t | France |
| 1980s | 928,576 t | 8,252 t | 920,324 t | France |
| 1990s | 915,600 t | 9,464 t | 906,135 t | France |
| 2000s | 858,356 t | 10,695 t | 847,662 t | France |
| 2010s | 813,715 t | 13,702 t | 800,013 t | France |
| 2020s | 725,510 t | 15,691 t | 709,820 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, France or Melanesia?
- France, at 676,156 t against 15,551 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between France and Melanesia?
- 660,605 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Melanesia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- France ranks 11th and Melanesia ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).