Gabon vs Sierra Leone: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Gabon
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 2,905 t against 2,740 t in Gabon, a difference of 165 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 154th and Sierra Leone ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 398.46 t | 345.67 t | 52.79 t | Gabon |
| 1970s | 575.47 t | 600.42 t | 24.96 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 767.08 t | 740.39 t | 26.69 t | Gabon |
| 1990s | 942.03 t | 823.11 t | 118.92 t | Gabon |
| 2000s | 1,183 t | 728.39 t | 454.85 t | Gabon |
| 2010s | 2,051 t | 1,857 t | 193.63 t | Gabon |
| 2020s | 2,436 t | 2,934 t | 498.44 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Gabon or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 2,905 t against 2,740 t in Gabon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Gabon and Sierra Leone?
- 165 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Gabon and Sierra Leone rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Gabon ranks 154th and Sierra Leone ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).