Georgia vs Togo: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 14,585 t against 14,302 t in Georgia, a difference of 283 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 118th and Togo ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,895 t | 3,881 t | 10,014 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 9,160 t | 3,825 t | 5,335 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 6,806 t | 7,289 t | 483.23 t | Togo |
| 2020s | 14,701 t | 10,460 t | 4,241 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Togo?
- Togo, at 14,585 t against 14,302 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Togo?
- 283 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Togo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Togo rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 118th and Togo ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).