Germany vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Germany
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Germany currently reports 404,720 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 16,925 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 629,332 t | 268,553 t | 360,779 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 598,853 t | 210,252 t | 388,601 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 563,038 t | 282,933 t | 280,105 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 415,453 t | 366,980 t | 48,472 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Germany or Uzbekistan?
- Germany, at 404,720 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Germany and Uzbekistan?
- 16,925 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Germany ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).