Grenada vs Kiribati: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Grenada
- Kiribati
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 106.44 t against 103.03 t in Kiribati, a difference of 3.41 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 188th and Kiribati ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 4 and Kiribati in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39.29 t | 31.98 t | 7.32 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 51.55 t | 36.14 t | 15.42 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 40.41 t | 42.17 t | 1.76 t | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 49.15 t | 50.17 t | 1.02 t | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 77.25 t | 79.62 t | 2.37 t | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 100.53 t | 98.3 t | 2.23 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 111.6 t | 102.45 t | 9.15 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Grenada or Kiribati?
- Grenada, at 106.44 t against 103.03 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Grenada and Kiribati?
- 3.41 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Kiribati rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Grenada ranks 188th and Kiribati ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).