Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 85,184 t against 77,861 t in Guatemala, a difference of 7,323 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 53rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,854 t | 809.52 t | 9,045 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 18,790 t | 2,035 t | 16,755 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 26,272 t | 45,829 t | 19,558 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 42,967 t | 69,578 t | 26,611 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 54,634 t | 67,677 t | 13,043 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 73,946 t | 60,706 t | 13,240 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 78,368 t | 83,977 t | 5,609 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 85,184 t against 77,861 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
- 7,323 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Saudi Arabia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 53rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).