Honduras vs Sri Lanka: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Honduras
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 42,076 t against 39,588 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2,488 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Honduras ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,931 t | 17,909 t | 8,979 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 10,472 t | 22,230 t | 11,758 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 11,646 t | 33,776 t | 22,130 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 21,916 t | 40,377 t | 18,461 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 28,078 t | 55,129 t | 27,051 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 36,193 t | 48,362 t | 12,169 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 43,840 t | 48,870 t | 5,030 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Honduras or Sri Lanka?
- Honduras, at 42,076 t against 39,588 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Honduras and Sri Lanka?
- 2,488 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Sri Lanka rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Honduras ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).