Hungary vs Nigeria: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Nigeria
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 101,876 t against 91,475 t in Nigeria, a difference of 10,401 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 44th and Nigeria ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 105,513 t | 7,785 t | 97,729 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 200,985 t | 16,965 t | 184,019 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 232,359 t | 52,547 t | 179,812 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 114,407 t | 75,896 t | 38,511 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 117,283 t | 83,979 t | 33,304 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 130,709 t | 139,990 t | 9,281 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 135,172 t | 156,294 t | 21,123 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Nigeria?
- Hungary, at 101,876 t against 91,475 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Nigeria?
- 10,401 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Nigeria rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 44th and Nigeria ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).