Indonesia vs Türkiye: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Indonesia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1.23 million t against 610,942 t in Türkiye, a difference of 617,078 t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 2.0 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 7th and Türkiye ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 6 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78,944 t | 47,453 t | 31,491 t | Indonesia |
| 1970s | 160,391 t | 166,061 t | 5,670 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 449,887 t | 306,958 t | 142,929 t | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 654,995 t | 379,580 t | 275,415 t | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 842,531 t | 414,584 t | 427,947 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1.11 million t | 488,608 t | 622,647 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 1.31 million t | 580,106 t | 725,246 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Indonesia or Türkiye?
- Indonesia, at 1.23 million t against 610,942 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Indonesia and Türkiye?
- 617,078 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Türkiye rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Indonesia ranks 7th and Türkiye ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).