Jamaica vs Mauritania: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 3,486 t against 2,978 t in Jamaica, a difference of 508 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 151st and Mauritania ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,560 t | 1,516 t | 2,044 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 4,093 t | 1,536 t | 2,556 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 4,636 t | 1,686 t | 2,949 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 4,032 t | 2,877 t | 1,156 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 4,054 t | 2,725 t | 1,329 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 3,292 t | 3,398 t | 105.87 t | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 3,046 t | 3,675 t | 628.87 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Jamaica or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 3,486 t against 2,978 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 508 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritania rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Jamaica ranks 151st and Mauritania ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).