Kazakhstan vs Uruguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 68,832 t against 65,712 t in Uruguay, a difference of 3,120 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75,172 t | 20,040 t | 55,132 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 47,561 t | 29,629 t | 17,932 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 70,854 t | 55,508 t | 15,346 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 69,527 t | 68,326 t | 1,201 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Uruguay?
- Kazakhstan, at 68,832 t against 65,712 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Uruguay?
- 3,120 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Uruguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).