Kyrgyzstan vs Madagascar: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 22,399 t against 19,379 t in Madagascar, a difference of 3,020 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 108th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,488 t | 13,191 t | 4,297 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 16,976 t | 10,490 t | 6,486 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 19,711 t | 17,575 t | 2,136 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22,266 t | 18,402 t | 3,865 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Kyrgyzstan or Madagascar?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 22,399 t against 19,379 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar?
- 3,020 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 108th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).