Kyrgyzstan vs Mozambique: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 23,388 t against 22,399 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 989 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Mozambique ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,488 t | 8,787 t | 8,701 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 16,976 t | 11,955 t | 5,022 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 19,711 t | 16,546 t | 3,165 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22,266 t | 23,823 t | 1,557 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Kyrgyzstan or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 23,388 t against 22,399 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
- 989 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th and Mozambique ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).