Liberia vs Luxembourg: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen

Liberia
2,369 t
in 2023
Luxembourg
1,916 t
in 2023
Liberia rank
157th
Luxembourg rank
160th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Liberia
  • Luxembourg
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 2,369 t against 1,916 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 453 t.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Liberia ranks 157th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 1,275 t 2,173 t 897.77 t Luxembourg
2010s 2,591 t 2,472 t 118.23 t Liberia
2020s 2,690 t 2,095 t 594.19 t Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Liberia or Luxembourg?
Liberia, at 2,369 t against 1,916 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Liberia and Luxembourg?
453 t, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Luxembourg rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
Liberia ranks 157th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).