Liberia vs Mauritius: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Liberia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 2,369 t against 1,955 t in Mauritius, a difference of 414 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Liberia ranks 157th and Mauritius ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 575.95 t | 2,938 t | 2,362 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,276 t | 3,086 t | 1,810 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 993.57 t | 3,329 t | 2,335 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 652.22 t | 3,768 t | 3,115 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,275 t | 3,170 t | 1,895 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2,591 t | 2,838 t | 247.38 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2,690 t | 2,133 t | 556.68 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Liberia or Mauritius?
- Liberia, at 2,369 t against 1,955 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Liberia and Mauritius?
- 414 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Mauritius rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Liberia ranks 157th and Mauritius ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).