Lithuania vs Norway: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Norway
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 47,600 t against 45,850 t in Norway, a difference of 1,750 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40,835 t | 47,330 t | 6,495 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 48,586 t | 45,128 t | 3,458 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 59,229 t | 43,827 t | 15,402 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 56,939 t | 46,438 t | 10,501 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Norway?
- Lithuania, at 47,600 t against 45,850 t in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Norway?
- 1,750 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).