Madagascar vs South Sudan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Madagascar
- South Sudan
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 19,379 t against 17,980 t in South Sudan, a difference of 1,399 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 109th and South Sudan ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18,525 t | 15,737 t | 2,788 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 18,402 t | 17,588 t | 814.33 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Madagascar or South Sudan?
- Madagascar, at 19,379 t against 17,980 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Madagascar and South Sudan?
- 1,399 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and South Sudan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Madagascar ranks 109th and South Sudan ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).