Malawi vs Malaysia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malawi
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 146,686 t against 122,806 t in Malawi, a difference of 23,880 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 37th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,858 t | 17,063 t | 15,205 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 5,013 t | 35,484 t | 30,471 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 8,935 t | 68,133 t | 59,198 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 12,746 t | 105,074 t | 92,328 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 23,266 t | 181,339 t | 158,073 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 42,621 t | 189,254 t | 146,633 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 79,228 t | 142,372 t | 63,144 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 146,686 t against 122,806 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Malaysia?
- 23,880 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Malaysia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Malawi ranks 37th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).