Middle Africa vs Romania: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Middle Africa
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 190,938 t against 101,015 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 89,923 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.9 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 31st and Romania ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,141 t | 145,833 t | 132,692 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 22,473 t | 280,914 t | 258,441 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 31,039 t | 376,765 t | 345,726 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 34,275 t | 189,075 t | 154,800 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 46,498 t | 147,430 t | 100,931 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 78,132 t | 165,748 t | 87,616 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 96,805 t | 195,924 t | 99,120 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Middle Africa or Romania?
- Romania, at 190,938 t against 101,015 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Middle Africa and Romania?
- 89,923 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Romania rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Middle Africa ranks 31st and Romania ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).