Montenegro vs Qatar: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen

Montenegro
1,673 t
in 2023
Qatar
1,519 t
in 2023
Montenegro rank
162nd
Qatar rank
163rd

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Montenegro
  • Qatar
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1,673 t against 1,519 t in Qatar, a difference of 154 t.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 162nd and Qatar ranks 163rd of 201 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 2,164 t 488.89 t 1,675 t Montenegro
2010s 1,884 t 804.34 t 1,079 t Montenegro
2020s 1,672 t 1,420 t 252.48 t Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Montenegro or Qatar?
Montenegro, at 1,673 t against 1,519 t in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Montenegro and Qatar?
154 t, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Qatar?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Qatar rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
Montenegro ranks 162nd and Qatar ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).