Mozambique vs Tunisia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mozambique
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 24,408 t against 23,388 t in Mozambique, a difference of 1,020 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,567 t | 2,992 t | 424.47 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 4,394 t | 7,591 t | 3,197 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 6,013 t | 14,081 t | 8,068 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 8,180 t | 17,979 t | 9,800 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 11,955 t | 23,926 t | 11,972 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 16,546 t | 28,106 t | 11,560 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 23,823 t | 30,866 t | 7,043 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Mozambique or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 24,408 t against 23,388 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Mozambique and Tunisia?
- 1,020 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Tunisia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Mozambique ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).