Myanmar vs Serbia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Myanmar
- Serbia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 101,379 t against 86,673 t in Serbia, a difference of 14,706 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 104,489 t | 110,010 t | 5,521 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 162,513 t | 90,088 t | 72,425 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 143,185 t | 82,913 t | 60,272 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Myanmar or Serbia?
- Myanmar, at 101,379 t against 86,673 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Myanmar and Serbia?
- 14,706 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Serbia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Myanmar ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).