Namibia vs Slovenia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Namibia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 8,185 t against 7,799 t in Slovenia, a difference of 386 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Namibia ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,148 t | 11,314 t | 10,166 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 1,779 t | 9,526 t | 7,748 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 5,470 t | 8,514 t | 3,044 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 4,599 t | 8,425 t | 3,826 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Namibia or Slovenia?
- Namibia, at 8,185 t against 7,799 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Namibia and Slovenia?
- 386 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Slovenia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Namibia ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).